People

Adapted from lecture materials by David Root [1].

Software is designed, argued over and delivered by people, and the parts of a project that a schedule cannot describe are almost all human: who understands the problem, who is motivated to solve it, who talks to whom, and who decides. This area covers those parts — first why projects go wrong often enough to need managing at all, then the individual, then the group, then how either of them decides.

Where to go What it covers Open it when
Why Projects Fail The Standish CHAOS figures, what “success” means under two rival definitions, and why any published project statistic needs its provenance attached [2] You need a number about project outcomes, or an argument for why management is needed
Personality Technical people as a population: Paul Glen’s Leading Geeks archetype, MBTI and its evidential problems, national culture, and Goleman’s six leadership styles with the practice page beside them You are working with one person, or deciding how to lead
Teams What a team is and what predicts its performance, formation and the stage models, motivation and social loafing You are working with a group rather than an individual
Decisions How experts decide under pressure, how groups decide badly, which biases are actually established in software engineering, and what changes when the advice comes from a model Something has to be decided, or a decision has gone wrong

One habit runs through all three. Management claims arrive with numbers attached — 29% of projects succeed, a leadership style correlates .54 with climate, a personality type predicts performance — and the numbers are usually weaker than the sentence around them. Each page here states what its evidence is and what it is not, in a How solid is this? section near the foot. Read that section before you quote the page.


Acknowledgments

This page adapts material from lectures by Eduardo Miranda and David Root [1] on software project management.

References

  1. D. Root,
    Managing Software Development. Carnegie Mellon University / Innopolis University lecture series, 2014.
  2. The Standish Group International,
    “CHAOS Report 2015,” The Standish Group International, Inc., 2015.

Disclaimer: AI is used for text summarization, polishing and explaining. Authors have verified all facts and claims. In case of an error, feel free to file an issue.


Table of contents


This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.